![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEieWB8JG53RPJjMK5X2XhUMt45xTL-f6_i6b7KKKnzWcwdFL16nZaXu-JRGq_lsNkLjFBq91P9J4ulm0HclaGyR8uYEOm7GumyMsmmFLYgvnwo0-4OfOegQ-_lUo2FLQzoc1C4F9tPbBgMs/s200/CIMG3317.jpg)
The beautiful and ornate light fixtures in Grand Central Station are icons passed to us from 1913. A few days ago, as I walked my usual path through the crowds in the Main Concourse, I found my focus on the ten central chandeliers. Each one supports one-hundred-forty-four 40-watt bulbs. I was struck by the impact of that number. To burn those standard tungsten bulbs 24 hours a day at 40 watts apiece requires 57600 watts. Notably, I checked one
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhzMNJZLUovJEqF7nvtIW3fk6WnQNuVKjJ7sPQoEJ_0IsRcz95WIAOiIyoZr8WvnRlGnZyfwk6T8KPtW6khKhwXR6Ld1ejpy1VC3oUFHgFpvkC2i6QqKtc9EW3KwaEcJeILF1xX_VS-UD_E/s200/CIMG3318.jpg)
of the single light fixtures along the wall and those are 50 watt bulbs, perhaps a special purchase. Whatever, my point is that the cost of lighting a 40 watt bulb for 24 hours is approximately $.0.86, assuming the kwh cost is around $0.09. For 1440 of them that's around $452,016.00 each year just for the bulbs in those chandeliers. There are possibly thousands of bulbs throughout the terminal. Why does the MTA need to increase fares when they are so clearly willing to waste money to the tune of millions for an environmentally unfriendly choice?
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg60hQ2UJm-1WzQG1PeXXqfP-Nr-iRSPHZC_7iNRv9gY1uaxxVh2nFb0M7tDbAvZAVdykilnFdBCjROU4YBqN_X2oOggttOW6njqBc62ijZjnxPbk4rAXvZ8cVbTD7LJSA5TkeVJli2Bac8/s200/CIMG3316.jpg)
In the film, "An Inconvenient Truth" it was noted that we could each take personal responsibility for the planet. In my house we have indeed switched to the CF (Compact Florescent) bulbs. The following is a quote from the energystar.gov site: "If every American home replaced just one light bulb with an ENERGY STAR qualified bulb, we would save enough energy to light more than 3 million homes for a year, more than $600 million in annual energy costs, and prevent greenhouse gases equivalent to the emissions of more than 800,000 cars." In our home we have switched out all the bulbs. What's keeping Grand Central from doing the same?
In December here was a lot of talk around the New Year's ball on Times Square being converted to LCD lights and the amazing amount of energy being saved. As I look back now, I'm seeing all that media coverage as so much smoke and mirrors; a slight of hand distracting our collective attention away from something economically and environmentally meaningful. If energy efficient bulbs are good enough for my home and your home, then I would think that they are plenty good enough for our transportation cathedral. Will it continue to be beautiful if all of the bulbs are replaced with energy efficient alternatives? Of course it will: have you not seen the place?